On the Posse Comitatus, and Harriet Miers posted by me on 16:05 05 October 2005 |
| We're letting this post do double duty: we look at the issue of using the military in domestic operations such as disaster relief, and some more comments about the Harriet Miers confirmation situation, which is rather complicated.
The whole disaster of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita—both the storms themselves and the response of the governments—has raised many questions about the use of the military in domestic US operations. Many are worried about either a) eroding rights or b) eroding the preparedness of the military for war. To our mind, neither is a concern, and the military is an excellent force for disaster relief. Now to Harriet Miers: Even though my regard for Bush's Supreme Court nominations is lukewarm, I am taken aback by the bawling and squalling by conservatives over this woman's nomination. There are third specific items regarding this that need to be noted. First, back in June we did a piece called Finishing the Job: A Watergate Reflection, along with some subsequent pieces on the Supreme Court nominations from a liberal and conservative view. In these three pieces, it was our conclusion that the two sides, with their absolutist view of themselves and their total oblivion to the unintended (and unwelcome) consequences of government power, were headed for a showdown, the result of which would be a Leninist idea of a two-party system: one party in power and the other in jail. (Ronnie Earle has already showed the left's hand on this with the DeLay indictments.) With the conservatives' reaction, we despair of a constitutional solution to this conflict. We can no longer get it through our heads that democracy works in part because all involved exercise restraint and understand the limitations of the system. Our experience in Iraq should tell us that, in places where restraint is a dirty word (as it is in the Middle East,) democracy is impossible. We still contend that the left started this trend; evidently in the midst of their trying to take it all much has been lost in our society. Second, as we indicated earlier, we think that conservatives that attack Miers because she didn't go to an Ivy League school are plain stupid. Ivy League homogeneity in our government is central to our problem; putting more of these people in power only makes it worse. It can be shown that this homogeneity is eroding in business. We think that conservatives, transfixed by their need to succeed, have placed Ivy League education in their pantheon. They do so at their own peril. Third, we're positive that Ms. Miers' “born-again” experience will be used against her by the Democrats, if for no other reason than that their left-wing interest groups will demand it. Such was the case with fellow Texan Priscilla Owen, and there's no reason why the liberals (who we usually characterise as “God-hating” if they're from South Florida) won't do it again. Footnote on Priscilla Owen: her father, an Aggie, was killed in the Korean War when she was just a baby. Search our Archive |
Home | Introduction | What is the Gospel? | Downloads | Published Books | Subscribe to our Free Newsletter | RSS | Terms and Conditions of This Website | Contact Us
Click if you're having problems downloading Acrobat or opening zip or tar files. |
||
| This entire site Copyright 1997-2010 Don C. Warrington. All rights reserved. | ||