
| Everybody likes to blow their own horn whether they admit it or not. Politicians certainly do, especially if they can do it at taxpayers' expense (this is at the core of the advantage incumbents have.) It was this way in New Testament times: Our Lord commanded us as follows: "When therefore you give alms, do not sound a trumpet before you, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets, that they may be honoured by men. Truly I say to you, they have their reward in full." (Matt 6:2 NAS) He wouldn't have made this commandment if it were not a problem. The horn blowing we're considering today, however, is the blowing of the shofar, the ram's horn that was used in ancient Israel and still finds its place in the synagogue. It's gritty, primitive sound has found its way into Christian worship in many churches. Today we're told that, when the shofar is sounded, there is a special sweeping of the presence of God which results in praise and worship. We are also told that this is Biblical. Shofars have cropped up everywhere. At the beginning of this millennium I found myself working for a ministry which had a booth at a major ministry conference. We were right around the corner from the shofar salesman. We spent the entire week listening to one demonstration after another. This will drain the spirituality out of any event. But it got me thinking: is what people really say about this instrument true? The biggest problem in associating the shofar primarily with worship is that the trumpets actually used in tabernacle and temple worship in the Old Testament were metal: quote:It is interesting to note that the trumpet wasn't used here for worship; it was used as a signalling device for the movement of the camp and for summoning of the congregation. But let's look at the shofar itself. The word appears 72 times in the Old Testament, and the use of the ram's horn can be broken down as follows:
It should be noted that using trumpets, bugles and the like (not necessarily shofars) survived in military usage through the American Civil War, and are in many ways the basis for modern military bands. A use of a ram's horn that many of you have seen took place at the end of The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring, when Boromir blew his shofar for the last time.
Evangelicals have been very successful in reducing Christianity to its essentials. In the process they have stripped away many traditions built up over the centuries. A by-product of this process is that evangelical Christianity has lost most of its sense of "culture." As long as Christians can identify with and lead the culture at large, this isn't a problem. The problem comes now that Christians in the US find themselves following the culture, usually with disastrous results. Christians need some kind of group culture to help identify the community and keep it together. Instead of looking at other Christian churches that do have a definite culture and worship traditions, evangelical Christianity has turned to Judaism to try to fill the gaps. The main reason for this is that the Old Testament is the book of the Jews and it is easier to be Biblical (or at least look Biblical) if one follows what's there. Another factor is the Darbyite change in how Christianity looks at Judaism, jettisoning "replacement theology" with a central place for the Jews in the end-time drama. This strategy has two dangers. The first is that Christianity and Judaism are different in profound ways even if they have common roots and the same God. The rationale for the separation of the two is well documented in the New Testament. Evangelicals, with their narrow view of the history of Christianity, are unaware that part of the problem with institutions such as Roman Catholic and Orthodox churches is that they considered themselves the real replacements for temple Judaism and many of their liturgical and doctrinal practices are moulded around that vision, especially their concept of the priesthood. Evangelicals thus risk repeating history even as they try to remain faithful to the Word as they see it. The second is that Evangelical Christians are too quick to mould what they see in the Word around their own view or idea without considering the real roots behind it. The issue of penitential rites--a central use for the shofar--is a case in point. Evangelical churches, largely because of their Calvinistic view of perseverance (not necessarily of election,) have consigned penitential rites to the Roman Catholics and Anglicans. They are simply missing in most Evangelical churches, even those who do not hold a Calvinistic view of perseverance (those in the Wesleyan tradition, such as Pentecostal churches.) But in Judaism the one use of the shofar remains in a penitential rite. Are we so triumphalistic that we think that we never need ongoing forgiveness for sins? "If we say that we have no sin, we are deceiving ourselves, and the truth is not in us." (1 John 1:8 NAS) And then there is the matter of war. Liberals don't believe it, but evangelicals were drug into the public arena to defend the legality of their religion kicking and screaming. What will happen if and when persecution breaks out on a large scale in the US? If we want to get back to the shofar's original use, let's start by scrapping these sappy "calls to worship" and blow the horn (preferably through the church PA system) to announce the end of Sunday School and the beginning of the service. From there we can have a shofar blast to announce a time of penance--not every now and then, but regularly in our services. Then we can take them to start our marches and public demonstrations. And then...but by then we would be far better off waiting for God Himself to do the job: quote:Comments: 0 | Send to a Friend | Search our Archive |
Home | Introduction | What is the Gospel? | Downloads | Published Books | Subscribe to our Free Newsletter | RSS | Terms and Conditions of This Website (includes our policy concerning music downloads) | Contact Us
Click if you're having problems downloading Acrobat or opening zip or tar files. |
||
|
This entire site Copyright 1997-2008 Don C. Warrington. All rights reserved. Appearances of certain advertisements on this site do not constitute an endorsement.
|
||
|
|
||