When it’s time to shove social theory down the throat of people, things get tough:
Harvard College Dean Rakesh Khurana held what was promoted as a run-of-the-mill meeting to ensure the groups were aware of the latest school policies on alcohol and sexual assault, but the meeting quickly took another direction, according to the lawsuit reported by the Harvard Crimson.
The suit alleges that, at the meeting, Khurana waved a sheet of paper in the air that he said contained accounts of sexual assault: “Khurana said that the papers in his hand were very embarrassing to the clubs and that he could not guarantee that they would not be leaked. But, Khurana said, if some clubs became co-ed — systematically and soon — that would help the situation. It was an unmistakable threat.”
That, to me at least, echoes the speech that really launched Joe McCarthy into national prominence. Speaking at a Republican Women’s Club (a single-sex organisation!) in Wheeling, WV, he made this statement:
I have here in my hand a list of 205 [State Department employees] that were known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party and who nevertheless are still working and shaping the policy of the State Department.
There’s been a great deal of discussion of the exact number on McCarthy’s list, or whether it was a laundry list he was using as a prop. It would be interesting to call Khurana’s bluff and see whether his list was genuine. But bullying and intimidation is what the two speeches have in common, and in both cases it worked. For a while, at least…let’s hope that the fall of Khurana and his ilk is as spectacular as Joe McCarthy, their MO is the same.
It looks like things are catching up:
Kessel told MDA “There is no controlling Bill Clinton. He does whatever he wants and runs up incredible expenses with foundation funds, according to MDA’s account of the interview. “Bill Clinton mixes and matches his personal business with that of the foundation. Many people within the foundation have tried to caution him about this but he does not listen, and there really is no talking to him.”
MDA compiled Kessel’s statements, as well as over 6,000 pages of evidence from a whistleblower they had been working with separately, which they secretly filed with the FBI and IRS over a year ago. MDA has alleged that the Clinton Foundation engaged in illegal activities, and may owe millions in unpaid taxes and penalties.
From a personal standpoint, I am grieved at this: Andy Kessel and I were friends at the St. Andrew’s School in Boca Raton together, we reconnected years later. He told me he joined the Clinton Foundation after a successful career on Wall Street as a giveback. I really think that Andy was trying to do a good thing.
Unfortunately, in a culture like Bill Clinton came out of, doing a good thing is easier said than done, and I think that Andy was unprepared for that. My dearly departed mother, who was born and raised a few miles north of Bill Clinton’s hometown of Hot Springs, told me one time that the Arkansas way was “If you can’t win, cheat.” She knew this opaque culture she came out of well, and she wasn’t shy about using it against others when she felt the need to do so. (She wouldn’t vote for Bill Clinton either.)
It’s easy when looking at Clinton’s Ivy League education and his successful political career which led him to two terms as President (he outsmarted Newt Gingrich and many others, too) to forget that he’s a product of his Scots-Irish origins and upbringing. But that upbringing made him the masterful politician that he is. The Ivy League business–and to some extent Hillary herself–were necessary to build “street cred” with the Democrat elite. But the core never changes. (That’s something you need to remember about Elizabeth Warren, too.)
My prayers are with Andy and his family. He’s going to need them. I think he’s a good guy who is finding out that it’s easier to be Bill Clinton’s enemy than his friend.
This is evident in their campaign after the 2016 election to block conservative media:
Google employees debated whether to bury conservative media outlets in the company’s search function as a response to President Donald Trump’s election in 2016, internal Google communications obtained by The Daily Caller News Foundation reveal.
Some context is needed here: these are the same Google employees who have refused to do defence contract work because it was the “business of war.”
I’ve been called unpatriotic on both this blog and Twitter. But the reality is simple: unless you’re prepared to defend the country (especially when you can get paid to do so) you don’t have any business messing around with its political processes in the way Google can. These latter day hippie dreamers have the idea that we can go on being the liberal hegemon they like without the military capability to back it up. That may have been true in the past (before World War II, in the 1990’s when there was no other superpower) but that’s certainly not the case now.
And that leads to something else: if their idea is for only one side to be “out there” what’s the point of the United States? Aren’t we supposed to be about freedom? Unfortunately our discourse is dominated by a class that never knew real freedom to start with, and that’s most of the source of our problems.