Since the release of the ANCA 2019 Book of Common Prayer has open the floodgates for consideration of all kinds of controversial topics, it’s time to consider one more: that of ad orientem, i.e., facing the altar during the Sacred Mysteries rather than the people. That’s been the subject of a blog-to-blog volley between one Rev. Ben Jeffries, vicar at The Good Shepherd Anglican Church, Opelika, Alabama, and Robin Jordan of Anglicans Ablaze fame.
Personal note: I’ve sparred with Robin before on the nature of Anglicanism and many other topics. I noted that he opted to expand his own case on his own blog and not in the comments section of Jeffries’. Evidently his encounter with me was educational; I wish he had done this when we went at it, we would have both been better off.
In any case, the topic is of interest because I’ve seen it both ways. First, the altar of my home church, against the wall (and certainly facing east, which was easy to figure out in Palm Beach):
As a Roman Catholic, however, the priest always faced the people with the altar from the wall, for reasons that both Jeffries and Jordan explain in detail.
With Latta Griswold’s rule of “The minister should face the altar when he addresses Almighty God, the congregation when he addresses or reads to them, and the opposite stall during other parts of the service” in mind, the reasons why I think ad orientem is better are threefold:
- It is a strong statement against Bill Clinton’s Eucharistic Theology and its variations. While I am aware that Anglicanism, in common with Lutheranism, does not strictly adhere to this, the Scriptures are clear on this subject.
- It is the best justification for women ministering at the altar. Now that you’ve picked yourself off of the floor, hear me out: true Catholics will tell you that the priest is in the place of Christ and represents him to the people, which is why we can never have women priests. But that kind of priesthood has no real justification in the New Testament, as any true Anglican knows. At the altar the minister represents the congregation to God, and when he or she celebrates the sacred mysteries facing God with the congregation at his or her back, that’s a powerful statement of the reality of the role of the minister. Facing the people implies that the priest, in the place of Christ, is representing God to the people.
- It helps to restore the God-centred nature of our worship, and we need all of that we can get these days.
Now we know that trads and #straightouttairondale types inflexibly associate (or try to) ad orientem with the ornate High Mass. But that wasn’t always the case, and a couple of examples from the days of wine and the Tridentine Mass will suffice.
One common criticism of the ad orientem style is that its celebrants “mumble” their prayers. That was certainly the case during pre-Vatican II times, but it doesn’t have to be now. One good wireless microphone (which a celebrant should wear anyway, given all the movement during the Liturgy) should fix that. For parishes with a larger budget, it wouldn’t hurt to set up a camera to the side of the altar and see what it looks like when the celebrant actually faces God.
While I’m at it, I’d like to address one more of Robin’s assertions:
Cardinal Ratzinger as Pope Benedict XVI introduced a series of so-called reforms of the Roman Rite, which represent a retrograde movement in the Roman Catholic Church—a retreat from the reforms of Vatican II. Ratzinger, the writers on the New Liturgical Movement website, and Lang are a part of a movement in the Roman Catholic Church, which seeks to undo the reforms of Vatican II and to revive the Latin Mass and other pre-Vatican II practices. It blames the reforms of Vatican II for the decline in attendance at Mass in the West. Like the nineteenth century Anglo-Catholic movement in the Anglican Church it presents itself as a movement for the renewal of the church.
I was involved in a church plant that had lapsed Roman Catholics as one of ministry target groups. Our work with this ministry target group did not support the contentions of this movement. Among the reasons that the lapsed Roman Catholics with whom we worked gave for having stopped attending Mass was that they had undergone a divorce. They had been physically abused by the Roman Catholic nuns in parochial school as a child. They were concerned about the growing reports of sexual abuse of children by Roman Catholic priests, the failure of the Roman Catholic hierarchy to protect these children, and the safety of their own children. The Roman Catholic Church had not met their pastoral and spiritual needs. They had been baptized, catechized, and confirmed, but had never heard the gospel or had been invited to accept Jesus Christ as their personal Lord and Savior. How the Mass was celebrated was a non-issue.
I’ve discussed the impact of those retrograde innovations here and here. Robin is right up to a point, but the main impact of the whole “trad” movement in Roman Catholicism is to create a core of committed people, something that the Church–with its gradualistic “box checker” mentality and weak pastoral system–has failed to do. That isn’t enough to renew the church but without it Roman Catholicism will experience continual decline. And, in a culture where Christianity is unpopular and its legal status rides from one election cycle to another, having that core is essential to its survival.
But that brings us to Anglicanism in North America and what it’s here to do. As I see it Anglicanism has always been a “niche marketing” project, especially since American Christianity tends to be class stratified. If you want many people, you’ll start a non-denominational or Pentecostal church (especially if you’re not targeting white people.) If you want the “right” people, i.e., those with more education and resources, you’ll start an Anglican church. Paul could claim the following:
To the weak I became weak, to win the weak. I have become all things to all men, so as at all costs to save some. And I do everything for the sake of the Good News, that with them I may share in its blessings. (1 Corinthians 9:22-23 TCNT)
Most of our ministers these days can’t. They should find out, among other things, whom God is calling them to be an apostle to and do it.