

This entire site Copyright 1997-2010 Don C. Warrington.
All rights reserved. Appearances of certain advertisements on this site do not constitute an endorsement.
A little while back, I received the following response from my post Is Evangelism unAnglican?:
I just discovered your blog this afternoon. Haven’t explored it much yet, but I feel comfortable here already. Currently, I remain a traditional Anglican (Episcopal Missionary Church) who came to Canterbury by way of Constantinople (altough brought up as a vaguely Protestant Army brat). My daughter, baptized Greek Orthodox, and exposed to Anglicanism along her journey, now attends a Serbian Orthodox church. My granddaughter is being reared in that tradition. My husband is a very-lapsed Presbyterian with more than a nodding acquaintance with evangelicalism (Christian and Missionary Alliance). Our small family practices many varieties of Christian expression, and I personally have learned to respect all of them. (Close Catholic friends round out the picture.) Your inclusion of Anglicans ("Is Evangelism unAnglican?" posted 9 April) is very gracious. Thank you for your charity, and clarity.
Such a mixture of traditions and institutions isn’t uncommon these days. It makes a lot of people in Christianity nervous.
With my own broad background, I think that three questions are central in sorting out the real value of people’s spiritual situation:
Evangelical churches are successful primarily because they make it relatively simple for people to come to the place where they can answer all three questions, "Yes!" But two things need to be kept in mind:
And that realisation should cure a lot of triumphalism.
[...] What’s Important in Christianity [...]
[...] What’s Important in Christianity [...]